Why the study?
Does CSFV infection or vaccination induce different cell-mediated and humoral immune responses in d/d histocompatible pigs?
Does CSFV infection or vaccination induce different cell-mediated and humoral immune responses in d/d histocompatible pigs?
In a pig model, natural CSFV infection induces stronger cell-mediated immune responses than live attenuated vaccination, highlighting a potential area for vaccine improvement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Natural CSFV infection elicits stronger T-cell responses than vaccination in pigs; should not change practice and leaves open optimized vaccine designs.
A better understanding of cell-mediated immune responses to classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is essential for the future development of improved vaccines. We analyzed the generation of cell-mediated and humoral immune responses in d/d histocompatible pigs following CSFV infection or vaccination. Viral infection induced high T cell responses with high primary and secondary CTL activity correlated with high IFN-gamma production, whereas vaccination with a live vaccine followed by infection mainly induced neutralizing antibody but low cell-mediated responses. Moreover, high IgG1 response was associated with high IFN-gamma response following infection whereas a weak IFN-gamma response was related to a good IgG2 response but a low IgG1 production. These data could reflect Th1/Th2-like balance of immune responses depending upon immunization protocols, which has not yet been described in the pig. T-cell responses to CSFV were evidenced by CSFV-specific CD25 upregulation on CD4-CD8+, but not on CD4+CD8- cells, which further illustrated the importance of CTL responses after infection. Our results indicated that generation of cell-mediated immune responses was much higher following intranasal/oral CSFV infection than after intramuscular vaccination, which implies that the capacity of new CSFV vaccines to induce higher T-cell responses should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piriou et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: