What question did this study set out to answer?

To compare the three-year clinical outcomes and economic costs of surgery versus injection-compression sclerotherapy for varicose veins.

January 1, 1972International Journal of Epidemiology

The Economics of Treating Varicose Veins

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

DPDavid PiachaudLondon School of Economics and Political Science JWJean M. WeddellThe University of Sydney

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Comparative trial demonstrates equivalent three-year clinical outcomes alongside lower costs for sclerotherapy versus surgery, indicating outpatient treatment optimizes healthcare resource allocation.

Key Points

To compare the three-year clinical outcomes and economic costs of surgery versus injection-compression sclerotherapy for varicose veins.
Evaluated patients undergoing either surgical intervention or injection-compression sclerotherapy.
Assessed clinical outcomes at a three-year follow-up.
Estimated direct healthcare costs to the Health Service and indirect economic impacts on the community.
Clinical outcomes at three years showed no discernible difference between surgical treatment and injection-compression sclerotherapy.
Total estimated costs incurred by both the Health Service and the community were substantially higher for surgical procedures compared to sclerotherapy.

Cite This Study

Piachaud et al. (1972) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a92bfd20b68d46265a29ed2 https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/1.3.287

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The Economics of Treating Varicose Veins

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

The Economics of Treating Varicose Veins

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider