Key result
Fine-needle aspiration cytology supplemented by cell block immunocytochemistry successfully rendered a definitive diagnosis of primary splenic angiosarcoma with liver metastasis.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Fine-needle aspiration cytology supplemented by cell block immunocytochemistry can safely and accurately diagnose rare primary splenic angiosarcoma.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support FNAC with cell block for splenic angiosarcoma diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation.
Primary splenic angiosarcoma is a rare malignant vascular neoplasm of mesenchymal origin. The tumor is highly aggressive and has a high metastatic potential. It is usually diagnosed on histopathological examination of splenectomy specimen. Only few cases of angiosarcoma diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology alone have been reported in the literature. The cytologic features of angiosarcoma are heterogeneous, however, diagnosis can be suggested by FNA when vasoformative features are present. A 55-year-old female presented with abdominal pain and hepatosplenomegaly. Computed tomography scan revealed a heterogeneous splenic lesion with liver metastases. FNA from the splenic and liver lesions showed moderately pleomorphic tumor cells closely associated with anastomosing vascular channels. Cell block immunocytochemistry (ICC) showed tumor cells positive for CD31, CD34, CD68 as well as for CD99. FNA supplemented by cell block ICC can render a definite diagnosis of primary splenic angiosarcoma with liver metastasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2018) conducted a case report in Primary splenic angiosarcoma with liver metastasis (n=1). Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and cell block immunocytochemistry (ICC) was evaluated on Diagnosis of primary splenic angiosarcoma. Fine-needle aspiration cytology supplemented by cell block immunocytochemistry successfully rendered a definitive diagnosis of primary splenic angiosarcoma with liver metastasis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: