Key result
Aerobic interval training was feasible in nonambulant persons after stroke, achieving 93% attendance with no adverse events and a mean VO2peak increase of 2.3 mL·kg−1·min−1 over 10 weeks.
Why the study?
Aerobic exercise reduces modifiable cardiovascular risk factors after stroke, but it is challenging and under-researched in nonambulant persons.
Is aerobic interval training feasible and does it improve cardiorespiratory fitness in nonambulant persons after stroke?
Is aerobic interval training feasible and does it improve cardiorespiratory fitness in nonambulant persons after stroke?
Aerobic interval training on a cycle ergometer is feasible, safe, and may improve cardiorespiratory fitness in nonambulant stroke survivors.
May support aerobic interval training in nonambulant stroke survivors; leaves open efficacy confirmation in randomized trials.
Background: Modifiable cardiovascular risk factors are prevalent and poorly managed in people after stroke. Aerobic exercise is effective in reducing many modifiable cardiovascular risk factors after stroke but is challenging and under-researched in nonambulant persons. This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility of aerobic interval training in nonambulant persons after stroke. Methods: Aerobic exercise was performed on an upright or semi-recumbent cycle ergometer. Participants were prescribed 4 × 4-min intervals of exercise at 85% maximum age-predicted heart rate (APHRmax) with a 3-min active recovery at 70%APHRmax per 30-min session, 3 times per week for 10 weeks. Heart rate, rating of perceived exertion, workload, cadence, and duration of exercise achieved were recorded for each interval. Results: Nine participants (mean ± SD; age 62 ± 12 y; 5 males) unable to walk without assistance after stroke (2.9 ± 3.9 y) were recruited. There were no adverse events reported, but there was one dropout (due to bronchitis). Attendance for the remaining participants was 93 ± 6%. The mean training %APHRmax was 72 ± 14% for the higher intensity interval and 57 ± 21% for the recovery interval. The mean increase in training workload between weeks 1 and 10 was 11.2 ± 11.6 W (27 ± 28%) for the higher intensity interval and 4.0 ± 7.7W (17 ± 33%) for the recovery interval. The mean increase in VO2peak was 2.3 ± 2.9 mL·kg−1·min−1 (18 ± 22%) over the 10-week intervention. Conclusion: Aerobic interval training at a moderate-vigorous intensity on an upright or recumbent cycle ergometer is feasible for nonambulant persons after stroke. Aerobic interval training should be further investigated to determine its potential to improve cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke and risk factors for recurrent stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valkenborghs et al. (2019) studied Stroke (n=9). Aerobic interval training was evaluated on Feasibility (adverse events, attendance, training workload, and VO2peak). Aerobic interval training was feasible in nonambulant persons after stroke, achieving 93% attendance with no adverse events and a mean VO2peak increase of 2.3 mL·kg−1·min−1 over 10 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: