Key result
Machine learning models utilizing clinical factors accurately predicted first-year all-cause mortality in incident hemodialysis patients (Model 2 AUC 0.85; 95% CI 0.81-0.86).
Why the study?
First-year survival among patients undergoing hemodialysis remains poor, and existing regression-based mortality risk scores have limited applicability and robustness.
Can machine learning models utilizing clinical factors accurately predict first-year mortality in incident hemodialysis patients?
Cohort (n=11,179)
Yes
Can machine learning models utilizing clinical factors accurately predict first-year mortality in incident hemodialysis patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.85 (95% CI 0.81-0.86)
Machine learning models using clinical factors at or shortly after dialysis initiation can accurately predict first-year mortality in incident hemodialysis patients.
May inform early mortality risk stratification in incident hemodialysis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The first-year survival rate among patients undergoing hemodialysis remains poor. Current mortality risk scores for patients undergoing hemodialysis employ regression techniques and have limited applicability and robustness. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a machine learning model utilizing clinical factors to predict first-year mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis that could assist physicians in classifying high-risk patients. METHODS: Training and testing cohorts consisted of 5351 patients from a single center and 5828 patients from 97 renal centers undergoing hemodialysis (incident only). The outcome was all-cause mortality during the first year of dialysis. Extreme gradient boosting was used for algorithm training and validation. Two models were established based on the data obtained at dialysis initiation (model 1) and data 0-3 months after dialysis initiation (model 2), and 10-fold cross-validation was applied to each model. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity (recall), specificity, precision, balanced accuracy, and F1 score were used to assess the predictive ability of the models. RESULTS: In the training and testing cohorts, 585 (10.93%) and 764 (13.11%) patients, respectively, died during the first-year follow-up. Of 42 candidate features, the 15 most important features were selected. The performance of model 1 (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.84) was similar to that of model 2 (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated 2 machine learning models to predict first-year mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Both models could be used to stratify high-risk patients at the early stages of dialysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheng et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in incident hemodialysis (n=11,179). Machine learning models (extreme gradient boosting) was evaluated on all-cause mortality during the first year of dialysis (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.86). Machine learning models utilizing clinical factors accurately predicted first-year all-cause mortality in incident hemodialysis patients (Model 2 AUC 0.85; 95% CI 0.81-0.86).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: