Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In evaluating integrals over the Brillouin zone by Houston's method, a normalization factor has to be used. A wave-vector-dependent normalization factor nj(q + Δq/2) is calculated by equating the volume common to a spherical shell of radius q and thickness Δq and the simple cubic Brillouin zone to the expression given by a j-direction Houston method. Some sample integrals are evaluated using this (GS) normalization procedure and Horton and Schiff's (HS) normalization procedure, originally developed for face-centered cubic lattices. The superiority of the GS method, especially with highly anisotropic functions, is demonstrated. From an evaluation of the moments of the frequency distribution function in a simple cubic lattice for various values of the anisotropy parameter, it is concluded that, when high accuracy is desired, the GS procedure is applicable over a wider range of anisotropy parameter than the HS procedure. The θ–T curve calculated by using the correct normalization procedure in a simple cubic lattice is in good agreement with that calculated by Blackman's method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganesan et al. (1962) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: