Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two sum-based estimators are proposed as fast, accurate methods for estimating the normalized acf of stationary processes. For Gaussian processes, their performances are evaluated in terms of bias and covariance, and are compared to the ones of the conventional Direct estimator and of the Hybrid-Sign and the Polarity Coincidence fast methods. For high correlation values, the proposed estimators exhibit the same accuracy as the Direct estimator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacovitti et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: