Key result
Psychosocial stress is empirically linked to cardiovascular diseases, but ambiguous research results limit the understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.
Why the study?
Are there pathophysiological reliable mechanisms relating psychosocial stress to the development of cardiovascular diseases?
This review explores the pathophysiological mechanisms linking psychosocial stress to the development of atherosclerosis-related cardiovascular diseases.
Highlights need for stress consideration in CVD care; leaves open precise mechanisms, warranting further mechanistic studies.
Fifty five years after the first finding relating mood disturbances and cardiovascular diseases, there is still debate on the formation of a cogent conception embracing all the fragments of insight within the various aspects relating psychosocial stress to cardiovascular diseases. The clinical comorbidity is empirically evident, but there are ambiguous research results limiting the value of the proposed pathophysiological mechanisms. Psychosocial stress represents here any event that relates psychological phenomena to the social environment and to the associated pathophysiological changes. Stress denotes the external or environmental factors to which people are exposed, as well as the behavioural or biological reaction to it (response that some authors call "distress"). Cardiovascular diseases will be considered here only when being the consequence of chronic inflammatory disease of arteries (atherosclerosis). The question is: are there pathophysiological reliable mechanisms relating psychosocial stress to the development of cardiovascular diseases?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salvador Vale (2005) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases (atherosclerosis). Psychosocial stress was evaluated. Psychosocial stress is empirically linked to cardiovascular diseases, but ambiguous research results limit the understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: