Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anti-D+C are often initially identified in sera from alloimmunized women. Anti-G may be present in these samples, mimicking anti-D+C, and therefore the differentiation of anti-D, -C and -G may be important. Sera from 27 alloimmunized women, initially identified as containing anti-D + anti-C, were analysed by adsorption/elution studies in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG) using R(0)r (D+C-G+) and r'r(D-C+G+) red blood cells (RBC). Additionally, 15/27 samples were tested by adsorption in the presence of PEG and subsequently warm elution, using rGr (D-C-G+) RBC. Anti-G + anti-C, without anti-D, were identified in 4/27 samples (14.8%) and none of the newborn children needed postpartum treatment. The combination of D+G, D+C and D+C+G antibodies occurred in 25.9%, 11.1% and 48.1% of the women, respectively. Overall, anti-G was detected in 24/27 samples (88.9%). Pregnant women shown to have anti-G+C but not anti-D should receive Rh immune globulin. Additionally, the finding of apparent anti-D+C during pregnancy in D-negative spouses may lead to paternity testing and therefore a correct antibody identification is necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palfi et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: