Key result
The COSIMO study is a prospective, non-interventional cohort study designed to evaluate treatment satisfaction in patients with active cancer switching to rivaroxaban for VTE.
Why the study?
Does switching to rivaroxaban improve treatment satisfaction in adults with active cancer and VTE?
Cohort (n=500)
Yes
Does switching to rivaroxaban improve treatment satisfaction in adults with active cancer and VTE?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The COSIMO study will evaluate whether switching from LMWH or VKA to rivaroxaban improves patient-reported treatment satisfaction in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis.
Around 20% of venous thromboembolism (VTE) cases occur in patients with cancer. Current guidelines recommend low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as the preferred anticoagulant for VTE treatment. However, some guidelines state that vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are acceptable alternatives for long-term therapy in some patients if LMWHs are not available. LMWHs and VKAs have a number of drawbacks that can increase the burden on patients. DOACs, such as rivaroxaban, can ameliorate some burdens and may offer an opportunity to increase patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Cancer-associated thrOmboSIs – patient-reported outcoMes with rivarOxaban (COSIMO) study is designed to provide real-world information on treatment satisfaction in patients with active cancer who switch from LMWH or VKA to rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute VTE or to prevent recurrent VTE. COSIMO is a prospective, non-interventional, single-arm cohort study that aims to recruit 500 patients in Europe, Canada and Australia. Adults with active cancer who are switching to rivaroxaban having received LMWH/VKA for the treatment and secondary prevention of recurrent VTE for at least the previous 4 weeks are eligible. Patients will be followed for 6 months. The primary outcome is treatment satisfaction assessed as change in the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) Burdens score at week 4 after enrolment compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes include treatment preferences, measured using a discrete choice experiment, change in ACTS Burdens score at months 3 and 6, and change in HRQoL (assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue questionnaire). COSIMO will collect data on patients’ medical history, patterns of anticoagulant use and incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Study recruitment started in autumn 2016. COSIMO will provide information on outcomes associated with switching from LMWH or VKA therapy to rivaroxaban for the treatment or secondary prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis in a real-life setting. The key goal is to assess whether there is a change in patient-reported treatment satisfaction. In addition, COSIMO will facilitate the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in preventing recurrent VTE in this patient population. NCT02742623 . Registered 19 April 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohen et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism in active cancer (n=500). Rivaroxaban was evaluated on Treatment satisfaction assessed as change in the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) Burdens score at week 4 after enrolment compared with baseline. The COSIMO study is a prospective, non-interventional cohort study designed to evaluate treatment satisfaction in patients with active cancer switching to rivaroxaban for VTE.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: