ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVOpen ForumNEXTThe Role of Quality Assurance and Standardization in the Safety of Botanical Dietary SupplementsRichard B. van Breemen, Harry H. S. Fong, and Norman R. FarnsworthView Author Information UIC/NIH Center for Botanical Dietary Supplements Research, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612 Cite this: Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2007, 20, 4, 577–582Publication Date (Web):March 16, 2007Publication History Received12 February 2007Published online16 March 2007Published inissue 1 April 2007https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/tx7000493https://doi.org/10.1021/tx7000493discussionACS PublicationsCopyright © 2007 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views1085Altmetric-Citations42LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Assays,Dietary supplements,Pest control,Plants,Safety Get e-Alerts
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Breemen et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: