Key result
Adults with high ADHD symptomatology exhibited greater reaction time variability with decreasing event rates compared to those with low symptomatology, though no group differences were found in pupillometric indices.
Why the study?
ADHD is hypothesized to involve difficulties regulating tonic arousal levels due to inefficient effort allocation, but empirical tests assessing performance and pupillometric indices across manipulated arousal states are needed.
Does event rate manipulation affect performance and pupillometric indices differently in adults with high versus low ADHD symptomatology?
Cross-Sectional (n=76)
No
Does event rate manipulation affect performance and pupillometric indices differently in adults with high versus low ADHD symptomatology?
Adults with high ADHD symptoms show performance patterns suggesting difficulties upregulating tonic arousal, but this is not accompanied by differences in pupillometric indices, challenging the link between these autonomic measures and state regulation in ADHD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Findings should not yet inform ADHD assessment; challenges pupillometry as a state regulation marker.
According to the state regulation deficit (SRD) account, ADHD is associated with difficulties regulating tonic arousal levels, which may be due to inefficient effort allocation. We aimed to test the SRD account by using a target detection task with three different event rates (ER; 700 ms, 1800 ms, 6000 ms), in order to manipulate the tonic arousal state and its effects on performance and pupil indices in adults with high (n = 40) versus low (n = 36) ADHD symptom levels. In an additional condition, a fast ER (700 ms) was accompanied by auditory white noise (WN), to further increase tonic arousal level. The ER manipulation had a clear effect on RT and variability of RT. These effects were more pronounced for the high-ADHD group, especially for variability of RT with decreasing ER, suggestive of deficient upregulation of a tonic arousal state in that group, in line with their self-reported SRDs in daily life. Adding WN to the fast condition led to more errors, however similarly for both groups. Contrary to our predictions, the ER manipulation had no effect on tonic pupil size (as a measure of tonic arousal). Phasic pupil amplitude (as a measure of cognitive effort) linearly increased with decreasing ER, suggesting more effort allocation during slower ERs. WN decreased phasic pupil amplitude, but had no impact on tonic pupil size. Importantly, however, no ADHD-related differences were present for the pupil indices. In conclusion, adults with elevated levels of ADHD symptoms reported more SRDs in daily life and showed a performance pattern that suggests difficulties in upregulating but not downregulating the tonic arousal state. Surprisingly, these findings were not accompanied by group differences in pupillometric indices. This casts some doubts on the relationship between these measures of autonomic nervous system activity and state regulation, in particular in the context of ADHD symptomatology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drescher et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in ADHD symptomatology (n=76). High ADHD symptomatology vs. Low ADHD symptomatology was evaluated on Reaction time variability across event rates (η2p = 0.084, p=0.011). Adults with high ADHD symptomatology exhibited greater reaction time variability with decreasing event rates compared to those with low symptomatology, though no group differences were found in pupillometric indices.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: