Key result
In vitro, the combination of bivalirudin and cangrelor suppressed platelet activation in response to diverse agonists more than unfractionated heparin and eptifibatide.
Why the study?
Does the combination of bivalirudin and cangrelor suppress platelet activation more than UFH and eptifibatide in blood samples from patients with coronary artery disease?
Does the combination of bivalirudin and cangrelor suppress platelet activation more than UFH and eptifibatide in blood samples from patients with coronary artery disease?
In vitro testing of multiple platelet agonists demonstrates that bivalirudin and cangrelor provide broader suppression of platelet activation compared to UFH and eptifibatide, offering a model for streamlining antithrombotic trial design.
Platelets are activated in vivo by multiple agonists; however, platelet function testing in vitro has been performed predominantly with only one or two agonists of platelet activation. Greater insight into anticipated effects of antithrombotic regimens should enhance the design of successful clinical trials. To test this concept, we assessed platelet activation induced by multiple agonists and two antithrombotic regimens, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and eptifibatide compared with bivalirudin and cangrelor. Blood samples from 10 patients with coronary artery disease were spiked with pharmacologic concentrations achieved in vivo of either UFH (1.2 U/ml) and eptifibatide (1.7 microg/ml), or with bivalirudin (8 microg/ml) and cangrelor (500 nmol/l). Platelet function was assessed with the use of flow cytometry. Agonists included thrombin (50 nmol/l), adenosine diphosphate (1 micromol/l), the collagen-mimetic convulxin (5 ng/ml), and platelet-activating factor (10 nmol/l). When platelet activation was identified by the surface expression of P-selectin in response to multiple agonists, the combination of bivalirudin and cangrelor suppressed activation more than UFH and eptifibatide. When platelet activation was identified by the activation of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa (PAC-1 binding), the combination of bivalirudin and cangrelor was more effective in suppressing activation in response to thrombin and adenosine diphosphate, whereas UFH and eptifibatide more effectively prevented binding of PAC-1 when platelets were activated with the collagen-mimetic convulxin. In conclusion, bivalirudin and cangrelor suppressed platelet activation in response to diverse agonists in vitro more than UFH and eptifibatide. These results and this approach to selection of promising interventions should be helpful in streamlining the design of clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (2009) studied Coronary artery disease (n=10). Bivalirudin and cangrelor vs. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) (1.2 U/ml) and eptifibatide (1.7 microg/ml) was evaluated on Platelet activation (surface expression of P-selectin and activation of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa). In vitro, the combination of bivalirudin and cangrelor suppressed platelet activation in response to diverse agonists more than unfractionated heparin and eptifibatide.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: