Key result
TEVAR for type IIIb aortic dissection significantly decreased wall shear stress within the whole aorta compared to pre-TEVAR baseline (1.34 vs 3.80 Pa, p=0.0001).
Why the study?
Does Computational Fluid Dynamics accurately mimic changes in blood hemodynamics compared to USG-Doppler in patients with acute type IIIb aortic dissection treated with TEVAR?
Observational (n=5)
Does Computational Fluid Dynamics accurately mimic changes in blood hemodynamics compared to USG-Doppler in patients with acute type IIIb aortic dissection treated with TEVAR?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational Fluid Dynamics accurately models hemodynamic changes such as flow, velocity, and wall shear stress in patients undergoing TEVAR for type IIIb aortic dissection.
Background: We aimed to verify the accuracy of the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) algorithm for blood flow reconstruction for type IIIb aortic dissection (TBAD) before and after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: We made 3D models of the aorta and its branches using pre- and post-operative CT data from five patients treated for TBAD. The CFD technique was used to quantify the displacement forces acting on the aortic wall in the areas of endograft, mass flow rate/velocity and wall shear stress (WSS). Calculated results were verified with ultrasonography (USG-Doppler) data. Results: CFD results indicated that the TEVAR procedure caused a 7-fold improvement in overall blood flow through the aorta (p = 0.0001), which is in line with USG-Doppler data. A comparison of CFD results and USG-Doppler data indicated no significant change in blood flow through the analysed arteries. CFD also showed a significant increase in flow rate for thoracic trunk and renal arteries, which was in accordance with USG-Doppler data (accuracy 90% and 99.9%). Moreover, we observed a significant decrease in WSS values within the whole aorta after TEVAR compared to pre-TEVAR (1.34 ± 0.20 Pa vs. 3.80 ± 0.59 Pa, respectively, p = 0.0001). This decrease was shown by a significant reduction in WSS and WSS contours in the thoracic aorta (from 3.10 ± 0.27 Pa to 1.34 ± 0.11Pa, p = 0.043) and renal arteries (from 4.40 ± 0.25 Pa to 1.50 ± 0.22 Pa p = 0.043). Conclusions: Post-operative remodelling of the aorta after TEVAR for TBAD improved hemodynamic patterns reflected by flow, velocity and WSS with an accuracy of 99%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polańczyk et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Acute type IIIb aortic dissection (TBAD) (n=5). Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) vs. Pre-TEVAR baseline was evaluated on Wall shear stress (WSS) within the whole aorta (p=0.0001). TEVAR for type IIIb aortic dissection significantly decreased wall shear stress within the whole aorta compared to pre-TEVAR baseline (1.34 vs 3.80 Pa, p=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: