Why the study?
Computational hemodynamic studies of aortic dissections typically rely on idealized or generic boundary conditions rather than patient-specific data.
Does computational modeling using patient-specific boundary conditions from 4-D flow MRI accurately predict hemodynamics before and after TEVAR in a patient with TBAD?
Comparison
Pre-TEVAR vs post-TEVAR computational modeling validated against in vivo measurements
Design
Patient-specific computational hemodynamic simulation study
Authors
Loading...
Patient-specific 4D-flow MRI boundary conditions feasible for TBAD hemodynamics; leaves open prospective validation before clinical translation.
Does computational modeling using patient-specific boundary conditions from 4-D flow MRI accurately predict hemodynamics before and after TEVAR in a patient with TBAD?
Pre-TEVAR 4-D flow MRI can be used to tune boundary conditions for accurate post-TEVAR hemodynamic computational analyses in type B aortic dissection.
Pirola et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: