Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The contact resistance of metal-graphene junctions has been actively explored and exhibited inconsistencies in reported values. The interpretation of these electrical data has been based exclusively on a side-contact model, that is, metal slabs sitting on a pristine graphene sheet. Using in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to study the wetting of metals on as-synthesized graphene on copper foil, we show that side-contact is sometimes a misleading picture. For instance, metals like Pd and Ti readily react with graphitic carbons, resulting in Pd- and Ti-carbides. Carbide formation is associated with C-C bond breaking in graphene, leading to an end-contact geometry between the metals and the periphery of the remaining graphene patches. This work validates the spontaneous formation of the metal-graphene end-contact during the metal deposition process as a result of the metal-graphene reaction instead of a simple carbon diffusion process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: