Numerous examples of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery of ice sheets are shown and prominent features of glaciological importance which appear in the images are discussed. Features which can be identified include surface undulations, ice-flow lines, crevasses, icebergs, lakes, and streams (even lakes and streams which are inactive or covered by snow), and possibly, the extent of the ablation and wet snow zones. SAR images presented here include both L-band data from the Seasat satellite and X-band data from an airborne radar. These two data sets overlap at a part of eastern Greenland where a direct comparison can be made between two images. Comparison is also made between SAR and Landsat images in western Greenland. It is concluded that SAR and Landsat are highly complementary instruments; Landsat images contain minimal distortion while SAR’s all-weather, day/night capability plus its ability to penetrate snow provide glaciologists with an additional and very powerful tool for research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bindschadler et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: