Key result
Stress-related DNA methylation risk scores are linked to ~35% higher incident CHD risk.
Why the study?
Psychosocial stress is a key CHD risk factor, but DNA methylation remains understudied as a contributor to stress-related CHD, particularly in postmenopausal women.
Do stress-related DNA methylation risk scores predict incident coronary heart disease?
Cohort (n=7,780)
Yes
Do stress-related DNA methylation risk scores predict incident coronary heart disease?
Effect estimate: HR 1.33-1.37
p-value: p=≤0.0008
Stress-related DNA methylation risk scores can predict incident coronary heart disease, highlighting epigenetic regulation in monocytes as a potential mechanism linking psychosocial stress to cardiovascular risk.
MRS 13 associated with incident CHD across cohorts; hypothesis-generating for epigenetic stress markers and should not yet change practice.
Background Psychosocial stress is a key risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), particularly in postmenopausal women who face both a high stress burden and elevated cardiovascular risk. DNA methylation (DNAm) – a critical epigenetic modification bridging environment and health – remains understudied as a contributor to stress- related CHD. Methods We conducted an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of stress in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), an ancestrally diverse cohort of postmenopausal women (n=3,857). At screening visit, participants completed a questionnaire assessing stressful life events and provided whole blood for DNAm. Incident CHD was then longitudinally ascertained (follow-up mean/SD: 16.7/8.4 years), and DNAm signatures were evaluated as CHD predictors using Cox regression. Predictive models were independently validated in the Jackson Heart Study (JHS; n=3,053) and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA; n=870). The bulk-level DNAm associations were computationally deconvolved at the cell-type-specific level using tensor composition analysis (TCA). Results The EWAS in WHI identified 841 stress-related DNAm sites (99 hypermethylated, 742 hypomethylated with stress) after FDR correction, with 13 significant after Bonferroni correction, including sites located on immune and CHD- related genes (e.g., TNF , ALDH2 ). Methylation risk scores (MRSs) integrating the 841 FDR-significant sites (MRS 841 ) and 13 Bonferroni-significant sites (MRS 13 ) predicted incident CHD (HR=1.33-1.37; p≤0.0008) and mediated 16.5-17.7% of the association between stress and CHD. In JHS and MESA, MRS 13 independently predicted CHD (HR=1.34; p=0.036), whereas MRS 841 was suggestively associated with CHD (HR=1.27; p=0.087). TCA indicated that the greatest number of stress-related sites predictive of CHD was specifically in monocytes (133 total), with directions consistent with bulk-level associations (9 hypermethylated, 124 hypomethylated with stress). Conclusion Our study supports methylation risk scores as novel biomarkers of stress- related CHD and uncovers epigenetic regulation in monocytes as a potential underlying mechanism. These findings highlight biological pathways linking stress and disease and may promote personalized interventions in high-risk populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benavides et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary Heart Disease (n=7,780). Stress-related methylation risk scores (MRSs) was evaluated on Incident coronary heart disease (HR 1.33-1.37, p=≤0.0008). Stress-related methylation risk scores significantly predicted incident coronary heart disease (HR=1.33-1.37; p≤0.0008) and mediated up to 17.7% of the association between stress and the disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: