This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A sensitive and specific radioimmunoprecipitation assay was developed for the detection and analysis of anti-HIV antibody response in human sera with the use of 125I-labelled purified HIV proteins with subsequent sodium-dodecylsulfate gel electrophoresis (125I-RIPA). The 125I-RIPA was shown to be as specific but at least 1 log more sensitive with respect to the detection of gp41env and p24gag than the immunoblot analysis as tested in serum samples from several risk groups. Sequential sera were obtained from 9 individuals who seroconverted for HIV antibodies. In 4 individuals, antibody to p24gag was detected in earlier serum samples by the 125I-RIPA than by EIA or immunoblot; in the other 5 individuals, the detection of p24gag concorded in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA), immunoblot and 125I-RIPA. Moreover, in one of 78 randomly chosen EIA-negative sera from individuals at high risk, antibodies to p24gag could be detected by the 125I-RIPA. This early seroconversion was confirmed 3 months later by means of immunoblotting and EIA. The specificity of the 125I-RIPA was further demonstrated by analyzing sequential EIA-negative serum samples from 10 individuals at risk for AIDS, collected during 2 years at 3-monthly intervals. All 80 serum samples were found to be negative in the 125I-RIPA and the individuals revealed no signs of HIV infection. The 125I-RIPA technique may be a valuable confirmatory assay in the serology of HIV infections. The sensitivity of this test provides a reliable measure of effective sensitivity when new-generation screening tests are evaluated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huisman et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: