Key result
Adjuvant human leukocyte interferon treatment in osteosarcoma patients resulted in 63% being free of disease at 5 years, with negligible side-effects.
Why the study?
Does adjuvant human leukocyte interferon improve disease-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma?
Cohort (n=19)
No
Does adjuvant human leukocyte interferon improve disease-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma?
Long-term adjuvant interferon treatment in osteosarcoma patients yielded a 63% 5-year disease-free survival with minimal toxicity in a small pilot study.
Hypothesis-generating for adjuvant interferon in osteosarcoma; randomized trials needed before clinical adoption.
During the period from 1971 to 1990 all osteosarcoma patients referred to the Karolinska Hospital without signs of metastases received human leukocyte interferon (IFN) as adjuvant treatment. Patients referred between 1985 and 1990 were given more intensive human leukocyte IFN treatment, i.e. a standard dose of 3 MU s.c. daily for 3-5 years. These 19 patients, all followed for 5 years, were included in a pilot study which entailed patients with central localization where radical surgery was not feasible. Metastases developed in 9 patients, of whom 3 had local recurrences. Sixty-three percent are free of disease at 5 years. Side-effects were negligible and long-term toxicity practically non-existent. It is suggested that a randomized multicenter IFN trial should be instituted on patients with poor prognosis receiving chemotherapy and/or that IFN treatment should be combined with other therapeutic modalities--irradiation, chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic substances--in osteosarcoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strander et al. (1995) conducted a cohort in Osteosarcoma (n=19). Human leukocyte interferon (IFN) was evaluated on Free of disease at 5 years. Adjuvant human leukocyte interferon treatment in osteosarcoma patients resulted in 63% being free of disease at 5 years, with negligible side-effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: