Key result
Application of a standardized management algorithm achieved blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) in 77% of 817 hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Does a standardized, evidence-based management algorithm improve blood pressure and metabolic risk factor control in hypertensive patients in primary care?
Observational (n=817)
No
Does a standardized, evidence-based management algorithm improve blood pressure and metabolic risk factor control in hypertensive patients in primary care?
Implementation of a standardized, evidence-based management algorithm by a hypertension specialist achieves high rates of blood pressure, lipid, and glycemic control in primary care.
Supports algorithm-based hypertension care in primary care; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: Obesity is driving a high prevalence of hypertension and metabolic syndrome-related risk and disease. This report summarizes the impact of a standardized, evidence-based approach to managing high blood pressure and associated metabolic syndrome abnormalities that was developed and implemented by one Clinical Hypertension Specialist. METHODS: Longitudinal data on blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), cardiovascular and renal comorbidities, and treatment medications were obtained on all 817 hypertensive patients seen from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2003. RESULTS: The hypertensive patients were 72 +/- 11 (SD) years old, and more than 55% of them were high risk based on target organ damage, clinical cardiovascular disease, or diabetes mellitus. Blood pressure was < 140/90 mm Hg in 77% of all patients. Among the high-risk patients, mean blood pressure was 126 +/- 14/71 +/- 10 on 2.8 +/- 1.4 antihypertensive medications, with 88% on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, 59% on diuretics, 49% on calcium channel blockers, and 36% on beta-blockers. Among dyslipidemic hypertensives, LDL-C was controlled to < 130 mg/dL in 84% (510/605) overall and to < 100 mg/dL in 70% of the high-risk group (299/427). Among diabetic hypertensives, the mean HbA1c was 6.8%, with 64% (155/242) less than 7%. New patients demonstrated improved blood pressure, LDL-C, and hemoglobin A1c control over time as the management algorithm was applied. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of complicated hypertension was documented. Blood pressure, LDL-C, and HbA1c were controlled to goal in a high proportion of patients. The findings demonstrate that application of an evidence-based management algorithm can facilitate higher rates of cardiovascular risk factor control than are generally reported in primary care practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bestermann et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Hypertension and metabolic syndrome (n=817). Standardized, evidence-based management algorithm was evaluated on Blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg. Application of a standardized management algorithm achieved blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) in 77% of 817 hypertensive patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: