Key result
Including obesity and physical inactivity in standard risk factors cuts SMuRF-less ASCVD prevalence by ~74%.
Why the study?
Prevalent modifiable risk factors like obesity and physical inactivity are not included in the traditional SMuRF-less definition for ASCVD patients.
Does expanding the definition of SMuRF-less to include obesity and physical inactivity reduce the prevalence of SMuRF-less patients in an ASCVD cohort?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,121)
Yes
Does expanding the definition of SMuRF-less to include obesity and physical inactivity reduce the prevalence of SMuRF-less patients in an ASCVD cohort?
Effect estimate: 74.4% reduction
Absolute Event Rate: 1% vs 3.9%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 2.9%
Expanding the definition of SMuRF-less ASCVD patients to include obesity and physical inactivity significantly reduces the proportion of patients classified as having no modifiable risk factors, highlighting the importance of lifestyle factors in cardiovascular risk assessment.
Reduces SMuRF-less prevalence sharply with lifestyle inclusion; hypothesis-generating for refined ASCVD risk models in observational data.
Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death in Middle East. Some patients sustain events in the absence of the four standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs): hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia and cigarette smoking (SMuRF-less patients). Two other modifiable RFs, obesity and physical inactivity, although highly prevalent, are not included in SMuRF-less definition. Aim: To study the prevalence and clinical profiles of SMuRF-less patients in a large Middle Eastern ASCVD cohort using an expanded definition includes obesity and physical inactivity vs. the traditional four RFs definition. Methods: We analysed data from the Jordan SMuRF-less study, to compare between expanded and traditional definitions and SMuRF-less vs. SMuRFs groups. Results: An initial analysis that included 5,540 ASCVD patients [mean age 57.5 ± 11.6 years, and 1,333 (24.1%) were women] showed that 214 (3.9%) patients were SMuRF-less with none of the four RFs. A subgroup of 1,121 patients had available data on their body mass index and physical activity. Of this subgroup, only 11 (1.0%) patients were SMuRF-less with none of the six RFs were present. The 6-RF SMuRF-less patients were younger than those with ≥ 1 SMuRF. These patients also had higher median high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and lower median triglycerides serum levels compared with those who have 4-6 RFs. Conclusions: : ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT06199869.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hammoudeh et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=1,121). Expanded 6-risk factor definition (including obesity and physical inactivity) vs. Traditional 4-risk factor definition was evaluated on Prevalence of SMuRF-less patients (absence of standard modifiable risk factors) (74.4% reduction). Including obesity and physical inactivity in the definition of standard modifiable risk factors reduced the prevalence of "SMuRF-less" ASCVD patients by 74.4% (from 3.9% to 1.0%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: