Key result
Aspirin+ticagrelor versus aspirin+clopidogrel did not significantly reduce new stroke risk in good (5.5% vs 8.8%; HR 0.61) or poor (8.6% vs 8.8%; HR 0.97) aspirin responders with minor stroke or TIA.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether aspirin platelet reactivity affects platelet function and clinical outcomes with different antiplatelet therapies in patients with mild stroke or TIA.
Does aspirin plus ticagrelor compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel reduce stroke risk differently based on baseline aspirin platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or TIA?
RCT (n=628)
randomized
Does aspirin plus ticagrelor compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel reduce stroke risk differently based on baseline aspirin platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or TIA?
Hazard Ratio: 0.61 (95% CI 0.32–1.16)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.5% vs 8.8%
p-value: p=0.13
In patients with minor stroke or TIA, baseline aspirin platelet reactivity does not significantly modify the efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for preventing recurrent stroke, though poor aspirin response may be associated with less major bleeding.
Baseline aspirin reactivity should not guide ticagrelor vs clopidogrel selection after minor stroke/TIA; confirms uniform efficacy across strata.
Objective Whether aspirin platelet reactivity affects platelet function and clinical outcomes with different antiplatelet therapies in patients with mild stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remains unclear. We conducted a subgroup analysis of the PRINCE trial. Materials and methods Patients with mild stroke or TIA were randomized into aspirin+ticagrelor, or aspirin+clopidogrel groups; aspirin reaction units (ARU) were measured at the baseline and after 7 ± 2 days to assess response to treatment. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as ≥550 ARU (poor response to aspirin). The platelet functions of ticagrelor and clopidogrel were measured using the VerifyNow P2Y 12 assay for P2Y 12 reaction units (PRU); HPR to P2Y 12 was defined as >208 PRU (poor response to P2Y 12 ). Clinical outcomes included stroke and clinical vascular and bleeding events after 90 days. Results Among 628 enrolled patients, 69 (11%) were poor aspirin responders. After 7 ± 2 days, the proportion of poor P2Y 12 responders for ticagrelor versus clopidogrel significantly reduced in poor (2.6% versus 27.4%) and good (14.3% versus 29.4%) aspirin responders. There were significant interactions between treatment groups, and between treatment groups and aspirin platelet reactivity for poor P2Y 12 responders ( P = 0.01). After 90 ± 7 days, there were no significant interactions between treatment groups and aspirin platelet reactivity for new stroke risk (good aspirin responders: 5.5% versus 8.8%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 1.16; P = 0.13; poor aspirin responders: 8.6% versus 8.8%, HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.20–4.81; P = 0.97; P for interaction = 0.60). Major bleeding was less frequent in poor than good aspirin responders (ticagrelor/aspirin: 0.4%/0%; clopidogrel/aspirin: 1.4%/0%). Conclusions In patients with minor stroke or TIA, clopidogrel, and particularly ticagrelor, decreased platelet function in poor versus good aspirin responders. The poor platelet reactivity of aspirin could not sufficiently reduce the risk of recurrent stroke with ticagrelor or clopidogrel; however, HPR (poor aspirin response) may have a protective effect on clinically relevant major bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (n=628). Aspirin + ticagrelor vs. Aspirin + clopidogrel was evaluated on new stroke risk in good aspirin responders (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.32-1.16, p=0.13). Aspirin+ticagrelor versus aspirin+clopidogrel did not significantly reduce new stroke risk in good (5.5% vs 8.8%; HR 0.61) or poor (8.6% vs 8.8%; HR 0.97) aspirin responders with minor stroke or TIA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: