Key result
Use of angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives was associated with a lower rate of incident dementia compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensives (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.34-0.89).
Why the study?
It was unclear whether angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives convey a lower risk of incident dementia compared with angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensives in accordance with the angiotensin hypothesis.
Do angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives reduce the risk of incident dementia in community-dwelling older adults compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensives?
Cohort (n=1,909)
Do angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives reduce the risk of incident dementia in community-dwelling older adults compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensives?
Angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives are associated with a significantly lower risk of incident dementia compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensives in older adults.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open whether angiotensin II stimulation protects against dementia.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives (thiazides, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin I receptor blockers) convey a lower risk of incident dementia compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensives (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, and nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers), in accordance with the "angiotensin hypothesis." METHODS: We performed Cox regression analyses of incident dementia (or mortality as competing risk) during 6-8 years of follow-up in a population sample of 1,909 community-dwelling individuals (54% women) without dementia, aged 70-78 (mean 74.5 ± 2.5) years. RESULTS: After a median of 6.7 years of follow-up, dementia status was available for 1,870 (98%) and mortality for 1,904 (>99%) participants. Dementia incidence was 5.6% (27/480) in angiotensin II-stimulating, 8.2% (59/721) in angiotensin II-inhibiting, and 6.9% (46/669) in both antihypertensive type users. Adjusted for dementia risk factors including blood pressure and medical history, angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensive users had a 45% lower incident dementia rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89) without excess mortality (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.16), and individuals using both types had a nonsignificant 20% lower dementia rate (HR, 0.80; 95% CI,0.53-1.20) without excess mortality (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.76-1.24), compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensive users. Results were consistent for subgroups based on diabetes and stroke history, but may be specific for individuals without a history of cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Users of angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives had lower dementia rates compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensive users, supporting the angiotensin hypothesis. Confounding by indication must be examined further, although subanalyses suggest this did not influence results. If replicated, dementia prevention could become a compelling indication for older individuals receiving antihypertensive treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalen et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Dementia (n=1,909). Angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives vs. Angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensives was evaluated on Incident dementia (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89). Use of angiotensin II-stimulating antihypertensives was associated with a lower rate of incident dementia compared to angiotensin II-inhibiting antihypertensives (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.34-0.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: