Key result
Zero coronary calcium on pre-transplant CT safely excludes significant CAD with a 90% NPV.
Why the study?
Does the absence of coronary calcium on conventional chest CT accurately rule out significant coronary artery disease on coronary angiography in lung transplant candidates?
Observational (n=252)
Does the absence of coronary calcium on conventional chest CT accurately rule out significant coronary artery disease on coronary angiography in lung transplant candidates?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The absence of coronary calcium on routine pre-transplant chest CT has a high negative predictive value (90%) for ruling out >20% coronary stenosis, suggesting it could be used to safely avoid routine coronary angiography in selected lung transplant candidates.
Introduction and objective: The pre-transplant protocol for lung transplant candidates includes a chest CT scan to assess disease progression and often coronary angiography (CA) to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary artery calcium is commonly observed in these pre-transplant CT scans. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between coronary calcium detected on CT and findings from CA to determine whether calcium presence could serve as an additional criterion for selecting patients for CA. Material and Methods: We included 252 consecutive lung transplant patients who had both a CT scan and CA within 365 days of each other. Coronary calcium quantification was performed using artery-based, segment artery-based, and visual assessment methods. CA findings were classified by stenosis severity: ≤20%, 21–70%, and >70%. Results: This study showed very high concordance (kappa = 0.896; 95% CI: 0.843–0.948) between the three methods, especially in distinguishing patients without and with coronary calcium (kappa = 1.000; 95% CI: 0.929–1.071). ROC analysis identified the absence of coronary calcium as the best cutoff to differentiate patients with ≤20% stenosis from those with >21%, with a sensitivity of 73.5%, specificity of 55.7%, PPV of 28.5%, and NPV of 90%. Only 11 patients (8.7%) without coronary calcium had stenosis of 21–70%, and only 2 (1.6%) had stenosis > 70%. Conclusions: The visual assessment method yielded results similar to the other two quantification methods. The absence of coronary calcium in pre-transplant CT may be a useful criterion for selecting patients for CA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Concha et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Lung transplant candidates (n=252). Absence of coronary calcium on conventional CT vs. Presence of coronary calcium was evaluated on Differentiation of patients with ≤20% stenosis from those with >21% stenosis (Sensitivity 73.5%, Specificity 55.7%, NPV 90%). The absence of coronary calcium on pre-transplant CT had a 90% negative predictive value for ruling out >20% coronary stenosis, with only 1.6% of these patients having >70% stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: