Key result
A single bout of exercise induced a transient procoagulant state in patients with coronary artery disease, with no significant difference in overall haemostatic potential between high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training (p=0.424).
Why the study?
Exercise training causes an acute net increase in coagulation that may increase atherothrombosis risk in CAD patients, but the comparative acute haemostatic effects of HIIT versus MICT were unknown.
Does high-intensity interval training compared to moderate-intensity continuous training differentially affect acute haemostasis in patients with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=117)
Single-blind
1:1 ratio using adaptive randomisation
No
Does high-intensity interval training compared to moderate-intensity continuous training differentially affect acute haemostasis in patients with coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.4% vs 8.8%
p-value: p=0.424
A single bout of exercise induces a transient procoagulant state in patients with coronary artery disease, with similar haemostatic changes observed regardless of whether high-intensity interval training or moderate-intensity continuous training is used.
Both HIIT and MICT induce transient procoagulant shifts in CAD that normalize within 1 h; confirms comparable acute haemostatic effects.
Exercise training is associated with an acute net increase in coagulation, which may increase the risk of atherothrombosis in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. We sought to compare the acute haemostatic effects of a bout of moderate-intensity continuous (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in patients with CAD. Patients after a recent myocardial infarction were randomized into a HIIT or MICT session of exercise training on a stationary bike. Blood was sampled at baseline, after the exercise bout and after a one-hour resting period. We measured overall haemostatic potential (OHP), overall coagulation potential (OCP), fibrinogen, D-dimer and von Willebrand factor (vWF) and calculated overall fibrinolytic potential (OFP). Linear mixed models for repeated measures were constructed to assess the treatment effect. A total of 117 patients were included. OCP, OHP, fibrinogen, D-dimer and vWF significantly increased after exercise and returned to baseline after a one-hour rest, OFP decreased after exercise and returned to baseline levels after a one-hour rest. Linear mixed models showed a significant difference between HIIT and MICT in fibrinogen (p 0.043) and D-dimer (p 0.042). Our study has shown that an exercise bout is associated with a transient procoagulant state in patients with CAD, with similar exercise-induced haemostatic changes for HIIT and MICT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Košuta et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (recent myocardial infarction) (n=117). High-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) was evaluated on Overall haemostatic potential (OHP) time*group interaction (p=0.424). A single bout of exercise induced a transient procoagulant state in patients with coronary artery disease, with no significant difference in overall haemostatic potential between high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training (p=0.424).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: