Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of the STEP model, a systematic hospital-school transition protocol for children hospitalized for TBI. SETTING: Five children's hospitals in Colorado, Ohio, and Oregon. PARTICIPANTS: Hundred families of children with mild, complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (RCT); participants were randomized while hospitalized to the STEP (a standardized hospital-school transition protocol for children treated for TBI) or usual care condition. MAIN MEASURES: Questionnaire about child's special education eligibility status, support services, and academic accommodations; Achenbach Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL); Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF); Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP); Child and Adolescent Scales of Environment (CASE) Results: There were no significant effects, indicating that STEP participants did not differ from usual care participants on any study outcome at one month post-discharge or at one-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: The lack of significant findings in this study does not imply that effective hospital-to-school transition programming is unnecessary. Rather, the findings raise important questions regarding timing and dosage/intensity of intervention, appropriate measurement of outcomes, and fidelity of programme delivery. The study highlights difficulties involved in the conduct of community-based RCTs in the paediatric TBI population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glang et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: