Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the tensile bond strength (TBS) of contaminated universal adhesive (single-bond universal), following decontamination procedures, i.e., rinsing treatment and acetone treatment, used with and without pre-etching. Materials and methods:The occlusal surfaces of 72 extracted maxillary premolar teeth were ground flat using a diamond disc to expose superficial dentin.Based on the etching mode, teeth were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (n = 36): Pre-etch and group B (n = 36): Self-etch.Both groups were further divided into three sub-groups each: Group A1; B1 (n = 12): No contamination; group A2; B2 (n = 12): Contamination followed by rinsing treatment; group A3; B3 (n = 12): Contamination followed by acetone treatment.After the decontamination and rebonding step, composite microcylinders were bonded onto the surface with the help of a plastic tube.The samples were then subjected to TBS testing in a universal testing machine.The data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni's post hoc analysis (p < 0.05) and an independent t-test.Results: In both the pre-etch and self-etch modes, single-bond universal adhesive yielded lower bond strength values; both decontamination treatments could not restore the bond strength values of the contaminated adhesive to those of the control groups.Conclusion: Contamination of single-bond universal adhesive yielded lower bond strength with the rinsing and acetone decontamination procedures than the uncontaminated adhesive, but resulted in acceptable bond strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reddy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: