Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PRL receptor (PRL-R) expression has been analyzed in human hematopoietic tissues using flow cytofluorometric analysis with a series of biotinylated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against the extracellular domain of the rat liver PRL-R. In the thymus, more than 75% of cells were labeled by the anti-PRL-R mAb. Regarding PRL-R expression in the four T-cell subsets defined by CD4/CD8 expression, the majority of cells expressed low receptor levels, whereas a minority of double negative (CD4-CD8-) and single positive CD4+ cells were strongly labeled by the anti-PRL-R mAb. In the peripheral blood, an average of 80% of lymphoid cells, comprising all B-cells, all monocytes, and 75% of T-cells, were consistently PRL-R positive. Regarding T-cell subsets, similar percentages of PRL-R+ cells were observed in CD4+ and CD8+ peripheral lymphocytes (70-75%), and the density of labeling per cell was significantly lower than that occurring in B-cells or monocytes. Interestingly, the intensity of labeling significantly increased in peripheral T-cells after T-cell activation. The ubiquitous distribution of PRL-R in bone marrow stem cells, B-cells, monocytes, and T-cells was confirmed by the positive staining obtained in a set of human lymphoid cell lines. These data along with those showing that the PRL gene is specifically expressed in human T-cells suggest that lymphocyte PRL may act in a paracrine or autocrine fashion in both central and peripheral lymphoid organs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dardenne et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: