Key result
Coronary sinus pacing fails due to diaphragmatic stimulation in complete AV block with mechanical tricuspid valve.
Why the study?
Complete atrioventricular block after mechanical tricuspid valve replacement is challenging because transvalvular right ventricular lead placement is contraindicated.
Case Report (n=1)
Pacing in patients with mechanical tricuspid valves and epicardial lead dysfunction remains highly challenging, with limited viable strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diaphragmatic stimulation limits coronary sinus pacing feasibility; leaves open safer alternatives for mechanical tricuspid valve patients with epicardial lead failure.
Complete atrioventricular block after mechanical tricuspid valve replacement represents a challenging pacing scenario because transvalvular right ventricular lead placement is contraindicated. We report a 51-year-old woman with mechanical mitral and tricuspid valves who presented with syncope and complete AV block due to late epicardial lead dysfunction. Transient restoration of capture during transthoracic echocardiography suggested dynamic lead-myocardial contact or intermittent lead continuity. Coronary sinus pacing was attempted but abandoned because of intolerable diaphragmatic stimulation. The patient later deteriorated and died from septic shock. This case highlights the limitations of available pacing strategies after mechanical tricuspid valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guctekin et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Complete atrioventricular block and epicardial lead dysfunction (n=1). Coronary sinus pacing was evaluated. Attempted coronary sinus pacing for complete AV block in a patient with a mechanical tricuspid valve was abandoned due to diaphragmatic stimulation, highlighting limited pacing options.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: