Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reaction of RhCl3·3H2O and 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine (tptz) in refluxing ethanol–water (1∶1) resulted in the hydrolysis of tptz to bis(2-pyridylcarbonyl)amide anion (bpca) and afforded a mixture of RhIII and RhII complexes which were separated and characterised as [RhIII(bpca)2][PF6] and [RhII(bpca)2]·3H2O 1. Similarly the reaction of tptz and Rh(tpy)Cl3 (tpy = 2,2′∶6′,2″-terpyridyl) yielded mixed ligand complexes [RhIII(bpca)(tpy)]2+ and [RhIi(bpca)(tpy)]Cl·8H2O 2. The molecular structures of complexes 1 and 2 have been established by single-crystal X-ray analysis. In complex 1 two bpca moieties are co-ordinated to RhII with nitrogen as donor atoms in a mutually perpendicular fashion. In complex 2 bpca and tpy are bound to the metal ion in a similar fashion to that found in 1. The axial Rh–N bond distances in 1 and 2 are significantly shorter compared to equatorial Rh–N bond distances, indicating an axially compressed octahedral geometry of the metal ion. Complexes 1 and 2 exhibit absorption bands in the 545–600 nm region whereas their RhIII analogues do not show any band in this region. Electrochemical studies of 1 and 2 revealed a metal based reduction (RhII→RhI) at –1.13 and –0.72 V, respectively, followed by two ligand-based redox couples. EPR studies of 1 and 2 in acetonitrile at 77 K show g|| > g⊥ ≈ ge indicating a dx2 – y2 ground state and a compressed octahedral geometry for the metal ion, consistent with the crystal structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: