Key result
A 27-month provider-directed Internet intervention improved beta-blocker prescribing (adjusted improvement gain 2.6%; 95% CI 0.1-4.1%) but not 6 other clinical indicators in post-MI outpatients.
Why the study?
Does a provider-directed Internet-delivered intervention improve cardiovascular management indicators in ambulatory post-MI patients?
RCT (n=15,847)
Cluster-randomized
Yes
Does a provider-directed Internet-delivered intervention improve cardiovascular management indicators in ambulatory post-MI patients?
Effect estimate: adjusted improvement gain 2.6% (95% CI 0.1-4.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 85.5% vs 84%
A provider-directed Internet intervention for 27 months yielded only a modest improvement in beta-blocker prescribing but did not significantly improve other post-MI clinical indicators.
Modest beta-blocker gains without broader effects; challenges routine adoption of provider-directed Internet interventions in post-MI care.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk reduction in ambulatory patients who survive myocardial infarction (MI) is effective but underused. We sought to evaluate a provider-directed, Internet-delivered intervention to improve cardiovascular management for post-MI outpatients. METHODS: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) MI-Plus study was a cluster-randomized trial involving 168 community-based primary care clinics and 847 providers in 26 states, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico, from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2008, with the clinic as the randomization unit. We collected administrative data for 15,847 post-MI patients and medical record data for 10,452 of these. A multicomponent, Internet-delivered intervention included quarterly educational modules, practice guidelines, monthly literature summaries, and automated e-mail reminders delivered to providers for 27 months. Main outcome measures included percentage of patients who achieved each of 7 clinical indicators, a composite score of the 7 clinical indicators, and mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and hemoglobin A(1c) levels. RESULTS: Clinics had a median of 3 providers (interquartile range, 2-6), with a median of 50.0% of providers (33.3%-66.7%) participating in the study. Patients in intervention clinics had greater improvements (from 70.0% to 85.5%) in the percentages prescribed β-blockers than patients in control clinics (71.9% to 84.0%; adjusted improvement gain for intervention vs control, 2.6%; 95% CI, 0.1%-4.1%). We found nonsignificant differences in improvements favoring patients in intervention clinics for 5 of 6 remaining clinical indicators and levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and hemoglobin A(1c). CONCLUSION: A longitudinal, Internet-delivered intervention improved only 1 of 7 clinical indicators of cardiovascular management in ambulatory post-MI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deborah A. Levine (2011) conducted an RCT in Myocardial Infarction (n=15,847). Provider-directed Internet-delivered intervention vs. Usual care (control clinics) was evaluated on Percentage of patients achieving 7 clinical indicators, a composite score, and mean LDL-C and HbA1c levels (adjusted improvement gain 2.6%, 95% CI 0.1-4.1). A 27-month provider-directed Internet intervention improved beta-blocker prescribing (adjusted improvement gain 2.6%; 95% CI 0.1-4.1%) but not 6 other clinical indicators in post-MI outpatients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: