Key result
Upright body position increased the evoked response signal compared to supine position (9.7 vs 7.4 mV, P<0.05), while exercise caused a slight decrease and polarization remained unchanged.
Why the study?
Does body position and exercise influence the evoked response signal and lead polarization for automatic threshold activation in patients with VVIR pacemakers?
Observational (n=14)
Does body position and exercise influence the evoked response signal and lead polarization for automatic threshold activation in patients with VVIR pacemakers?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.7% vs 7.4%
p-value: p=<0.05
The supine position represents the worst-case scenario for evoked response measurement in pacemaker Autocapture function, while physical activity does not significantly impair it in recommended leads.
Supine position may underestimate evoked response for Autocapture; Level 4 data leaves open posture-adjusted algorithms.
The Autocapture function controls and optimizes the output of the ventricular pulse amplitude automatically. For this reason an automatic test has to be performed during follow-up to measure the evoked response signal and lead polarization for the calculation of the appropriate evoked response sensitivity setting. The aim of the study was to assess whether body position and exercise influence the evoked response and polarization. Both parameters were determined in the supine and upright position and subsequently during supine and upright symptom-limited ergometry. The study included 14 patients with the VVIR pacemaker Regency SR+ who had received the ventricular pacing leads Membrane E 1450 T (n = 8), CapSure Z 5034 (n = 4), or SX 60 (n = 2). The evoked response signal was 7.4 +/- 3.3 mV during supine and increased to 9.7 +/- 5.6 mV (+35%) during upright position (P < 0.05). The exercise tests were terminated at 105 +/- 36 W (supine) and 110 +/- 34 W (upright). There was a gradual insignificant decrease of the evoked response during each exercise test with a mean decrease of -1.1 +/- 0.9 mV (-15%; supine) and -1.6 +/- 2.1 mV (-16%; upright). The evoked response increased within 5 minutes during recovery to the initial values. Polarization remained unchanged during both tests. The pacemaker did not recommend activating autocapture in four patients who all had received high-ohmic pacing leads. In conclusions, the measurement of the evoked response in supine position seems to represent the worst case. Physical activities did not effect autocapture function in patients with the recommended lead, but the pacemaker did not always recommend Autocapture activation in some patients with high-ohmic pacing leads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schuchert et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Patients with VVIR pacemaker Regency SR+ (n=14). Upright body position and exercise vs. Supine position and rest was evaluated on Evoked response signal (p=<0.05). Upright body position increased the evoked response signal compared to supine position (9.7 vs 7.4 mV, P<0.05), while exercise caused a slight decrease and polarization remained unchanged.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: