Why the study?
Are serum MMP-9 levels associated with the presence and progression stage of idiopathic atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=115)
Are serum MMP-9 levels associated with the presence and progression stage of idiopathic atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=<0.05
Serum MMP-9 levels are significantly elevated in patients with idiopathic atrial fibrillation and correlate positively with the clinical stage of disease progression.
Hypothesis-generating for MMP-9 as progression biomarker in idiopathic AF; prospective studies needed before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVES: To observe levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and evaluate their significance in various stages of idiopathic atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Patients with idiopathic AF were recruited into this prospective study and classified into one of three groups according to stage of disease progression: paroxysmal AF; persistent AF; permanent AF. Healthy individuals were enrolled as control subjects. Serum levels of MMP-9 in all four groups were determined using a double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Each AF group included 25 patients; 40 healthy individuals were included as controls. MMP-9 levels in the three AF groups were significantly higher than in the control group: 168.72 ± 25.970, 201.36 ± 31.26 and 253.20 ± 22.99 ng/ml for the paroxysmal, persistent and permanent AF groups respectively, versus 76.80 ± 14.90 ng/ml for the control group. MMP-9 levels increased with idiopathic AF disease progression (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An elevated MMP-9 level appears to be associated with a diagnosis of AF. MMP-9 levels appear to increase in relation to the stage of idiopathic AF progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Idiopathic atrial fibrillation (n=115). Idiopathic atrial fibrillation and its progression stages vs. Healthy individuals was evaluated on Serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) (p=<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: