Patterns of interspecific cytoplasmic (plastid and mitochondrial) and nuclear introgression are typically asymmetrical: cytoplasmic gene flow or “capture” is frequently observed without evidence of nuclear introgression. In contrast, nuclear introgression without concomitant cytoplasmic introgression has rarely been demonstrated. Gossypium barbadense L. and G. hirsutum L. have large indigenous ranges in the New World semiarid tropics, with an extensive area of sympatry in the Caribbean and Central America. Numerous accessions of both species were surveyed for diagnostic cpDNA restriction sites. These data, in conjunction with previous information on nuclear markers, lead to several conclusions: 1) introgression between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense is bidirectional for both nuclear and cytoplasmic genes; 2) patterns of introgression between the two species are not symmetrical—in G. barbadense, introgression of G. hirsutum alleles is largely restricted to modem cultivars and is uncommon in areas of sympatry; in contrast, introgression of G. barbadense alleles into G. hirsutum is relatively common in areas of sympatry and is rare in modem cultivars; 3) nuclear introgression is geographically more widespread and more frequently detected than cytoplasmic introgression. Several mechanisms may underlie the differential patterns of cytoplasmic and nuclear gene flow observed, including differential fitness of infraspecific and interspecific cytonuclear combinations and selection against female function in interspecific backcrosses. Possible explanations for the observed asymmetrical patterns of introgression include differences in population sizes combined with phenological differences that bias interspecific pollen transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brubaker et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: