Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A comparative study of the enantiomeric substrate [(1R)-camphor- and (1S)-camphor)-bound cytochrome P-450cam concerns the spin-state equilibrium, substrate dissociation, the thermal unfolding of the protein structure, and the subconformer equilibria observed in the infrared spectra of the carbon monoxide (CO) complex of cytochrome P-450cam. The behavior of the different conformational equilibria in dependence on temperature, pressure, pH-value, cosolvent, and cation binding led us to suggest that (1S)-camphor is more loosely and less optimally bound in the heme pocket, which facilitates the access of solvent molecules into the heme-iron environment. The spin reaction volume difference measured using the high pressure technique is smaller by 16 +/- 9 cm3/mol for (1S)-camphor-bound P-450cam compared to the (1R)-camphor-bound P-450cam, which might indicate a higher water content in the protein and in the heme environment in the (1S)-camphor complex. The half-transition temperature of the thermal unfolding of 53.8 degrees C for the (1S)-camphor-bound oxidized cytochrome P-450cam is one degree lower than the value for the (1R)-camphor-bound protein (54.8 degrees C). In the reduced, CO-bound form of cytochrome P-450cam at 290 K the (1S)-camphor complex reveals another CO stretch vibration population distribution with slightly higher frequencies [1940.2 cm-1 (major band) and 1946.3 cm-1 (minor band)] compared to the (1R)-camphor complex [1939.7 cm-1 (major band) and 1930 cm-1 (minor band)]. A loosening of the contact between the iron-bound CO ligand and amino acids of the I-helix, probably induced by compensating effects of the increased water content, is suggested. Assuming the carbon monoxide complex as a model for the dioxygen complex, the more loosened binding of (1S)-camphor, therefore the increased water accessibility, and the weaker contact of the iron ligand to the I-helix might explain the higher amount of uncoupling of the cytochrome P-450 reaction cycle compared to that when (1R)-camphor is used as substrate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schulze et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: