Key result
Pioglitazone added to insulin therapy significantly decreased HbA1c levels (1.13% vs 0.55% reduction, P<0.05) and reduced carotid intima-media thickness in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Does pioglitazone improve glycemic control and reduce carotid intima-media thickness in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy?
RCT (n=48)
randomized
Does pioglitazone improve glycemic control and reduce carotid intima-media thickness in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.13% vs 0.55%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Adding pioglitazone to insulin therapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes improves glycemic control, reduces insulin requirements, and may prevent atherosclerosis progression as measured by carotid intima-media thickness.
Supports adding pioglitazone to insulin in uncontrolled T2D; extends RCT evidence to CIMT reduction.
UNLABELLED: Aims/Introduction: The present study was designed to determine the effects of pioglitazone on glycemic control and atherosclerosis in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 48 patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. We assigned patients to oral pioglitazone titrated from 15-30 mg (n = 22) or no pioglitazone (n = 26), to be taken in addition to their glucose-lowering drugs and other medications. Daily insulin doses and numbers were recorded during the study period. RESULTS: The adjusted mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values decreased significantly by 1.13 ± 1.50% and 0.55 ± 0.76% in the pioglitazone and control groups, respectively. Significant decrease of HbA1c level was observed in the pioglitazone group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The insulin dose lowered by 0.04 ± 0.10 units/kg/day in the pioglitazone group and increased by 0.03 ± 0.10 units/kg/day in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of insulin injections decreased by 0.1 ± 0.6 times/day in the pioglitazone group and increased by 0.2 ± 0.4 times/day in the control group (P < 0.05). The carotid intima-media thickness estimated by B-mode echography was carried out in both groups and decreased significantly at the end-point only in the pioglitazone group, relative to the baseline. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that pioglitazone is useful in improving glycemic control and preventing the progression of atherosclerosis in poorly-controlled type 2 diabetics on insulin therapy. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00064.x, 2010).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasunari et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (n=48). pioglitazone vs. no pioglitazone was evaluated on change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (p=< 0.05). Pioglitazone added to insulin therapy significantly decreased HbA1c levels (1.13% vs 0.55% reduction, P<0.05) and reduced carotid intima-media thickness in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: