Key result
During sevoflurane anesthesia, the Nociceptive Response Index (NRI) demonstrated only a weak correlation with Response Entropy (r = 0.30) and failed to accurately detect nociception (AUROC 0.56).
Why the study?
Various monitoring systems have been introduced for nociception, but the correlation between autonomic response variables—such as the nociceptive response index—and spectral entropy indices reflecting electromyographic activation required evaluation.
Does the nociceptive response index (NRI) accurately detect nociception compared to spectral entropy indices in patients undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia?
Observational (n=86)
No
Does the nociceptive response index (NRI) accurately detect nociception compared to spectral entropy indices in patients undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia?
The nociceptive response index (NRI) is not a reliable monitor for detecting nociception during sevoflurane anesthesia, as it correlates poorly with spectral entropy indices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NRI lacks reliability for nociception monitoring under sevoflurane; leaves open the need for validated alternatives in anesthesia research.
Objectives: During anesthesia, the response to these stimuli depends on the balance between nociception and antinociception. Recently, various monitoring systems based on the variables derived from electroencephalography, plethysmography, autonomic tone, reflex pathways, and composite algorithms have been introduced for monitoring nociception. The main aim of our study was to evaluate and correlate the physiological variables which reflect the autonomic nervous system response to nociception, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), perfusion index (PI), and nociceptive response index (NRI), with the spectral entropy indices response entropy (RE) and RE-state entropy (SE), which reflects electromyographic (EMG) activation as a response to pain. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the data from a prospective study on the hypnotic and analgesic effects and the recovery profile of sevoflurane-based general anesthesia. Eighty-six patients undergoing single-agent sevoflurane anesthesia were recruited in the study. The study parameters, HR, SBP, SE, RE, RE-SE, PI, and NRI, were recorded at predefined time points before and after a standardized noxious stimulus. Correlation between the variables was carried out by applying the Pearson correlation equation for normal and the Spearman correlation equation for non-normally distributed data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) graphs were plotted, and the area under the curve was calculated to assess the diagnostic accuracy of post-stimulus NRI in detecting pain which was defined as RE-SE >10. The area under the ROC curve for NRI to detect pain as defined by RE-SE >10 was 0.56. Conclusion: During sevoflurane anesthesia, the application of noxious stimulus causes significant changes in variables reflecting sympathetic response and EMG activity. However, NRI failed to detect nociception, and there was only a weak correlation between the reaction values of NRI and RE-SE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ajayan et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Elective lumbar disk surgery under general anesthesia (n=86). Standardized noxious stimulus (tetanic stimulus) vs. Pre-stimulus baseline was evaluated on Correlation between reaction values of Nociceptive Response Index (NRI) and Response Entropy (RE) (r = 0.30, p=0.05). During sevoflurane anesthesia, the Nociceptive Response Index (NRI) demonstrated only a weak correlation with Response Entropy (r = 0.30) and failed to accurately detect nociception (AUROC 0.56).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: