Key result
A novel pseudovirus-based neutralization assay for Coxsackievirus A10 demonstrated good correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.0001) and 97% agreement with the traditional cytopathic effect-based assay.
Why the study?
Traditional neutralization assays for CV-A10 based on inhibition of cytopathic effects are time-consuming and labor-intensive, creating a need for a robust, efficient assay to facilitate vaccine development.
Effect estimate: r = 0.83
p-value: p=< .0001
The newly developed pseudovirus-based assay provides a rapid and convenient method for measuring neutralizing antibodies against Coxsackievirus A10, correlating well with traditional methods.
New assay enables reliable NtAb measurement for CV-A10 vaccine development; leaves open clinical protection correlates.
Coxsackievirus A10 (CV-A10) has recently emerged as a major pathogen of hand, foot, and mouth disease in children worldwide. Currently no effective treatments are available; development of anti-CV-A10 vaccine is a most cost-effective way for CV-A10 prevention. Robust assay to measure neutralizing antibody (NtAb) titres elicited by vaccination would greatly prompt anti-CV-A10 vaccine development. Compare to the traditional neutralization assay based on inhibition of cytopathic effects (herein after referred to as cNT) which is time-consuming and labor-intensive, in this study we developed an efficient high-throughput neutralization antibody assay based on CV-A10 pseudoviruses (herein after referred to as pNT). In the pNT, anti-CV-A10 NtAb titre was negatively corresponded with the relative luminescent unit (RLU) produced by luciferase reporter gene incorporated in pseudovirus genome. As described in this study, the NtAb against CV-A10 could be detected within 10–16 h, anti- CV-A10 NtAb in 67 human serum samples were measured in parallel with pNT and cNT assays, a good correlation (r = 0.83,p < .0001) and good agreement(97%) were shown between cNT and pNT, indicating that the pNT provides a rapid and convenient procedure for measuring NtAb production against anti-CV-A10 NtAb measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2019) studied Coxsackievirus A10 (CV-A10) neutralizing antibody measurement (n=67). Pseudovirus-based neutralization assay (pNT) vs. Traditional neutralization assay based on inhibition of cytopathic effects (cNT) was evaluated on Correlation and agreement between pNT and cNT assays (r = 0.83, p=< .0001). A novel pseudovirus-based neutralization assay for Coxsackievirus A10 demonstrated good correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.0001) and 97% agreement with the traditional cytopathic effect-based assay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: