Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The principal objective of this investigation was to evaluate 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 N HOAc with and without 0.015 N NH4F at 1:10 and 1:5 vol/vol soil-extractant ratios and 5-, 15-, or 30-min extraction times for determining available P in acid and calcareous soils. To that end, P concentrations (ranging from about 5 to 150 μg ml-1, NaHCO3) were extracted from 78 soils (40 had pH values between 4.2 and 6.9; the remainder from 7 to 9.2) and contrasted with reference values by means of graphing, correlation, and regression techniques. Reference P values were obtained with the Bray-1 P solution for soils with pH values < 7.0 (H2O), and NaHCO3 (Olsen et al.) solution for all soils. Results established that NH4F, 5-min extraction times, and 1:10 soil-solution ratios were necessary for optimizing the relationships between P concentrations for acid and, to a lesser extent, calcareous soils. Substituting from 0.025 to 1.0 N HOAc for the 0.025 N HCl in the Bray solution resulted in a P extractant that compared well with the Bray solution on acid soils, and with the NaHCO3 solution on both acid and calcareous soils. As higher acid concentrations were unnecessary, the 0.25 N HOAc + 0.015 N NH4F solution with a 1:10 soil-solution ratio and 5-min extraction time was selected as the Kelowna extractant. It removed similar amounts of P as the Bray −1 P but 2.5 times more than the 0.5 N NaHCO3 solution (r values ≥ 0.98**). Extractant pH was maintained as effectively with 0.25 N HOAc at 1:10 ratio and 5-min extraction time, as with more concentrated acids, even on a soil containing 38% CaCO3 equivalent. The Kelowna extractant has been used since 1984 to simultaneously extract NO3-N and P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, and S from acid and calcareous soils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W. van Lierop (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: