Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A previous study by our group found nickel-titanium (NiTi) 0.02 hand files maintained the original canal shape better than similar stainless-steel K-files (SS-K). Inexperienced dental students used both file types on molar teeth. The purpose of this study was to compare the 1-yr success rate of endodontic treatment of the same teeth used in our previous study. Twelve-month follow-up radiographs were compared with the immediate follow-up radiographs. Both sets of radiographs were taken with the same customized stent. Quantification of osseous changes using digital imaging was used. Thus, a reliable numerical estimation (densitometric ratio) of disease and healing processes could be established. Sixty-seven percent of the patients returned for the 12-month radiographs (19 NiTi vs. 21 SS-K). Immediate postoperative periapical status was found to be similar (p > 0.05). Teeth instrumented with the NiTi files demonstrated a higher mean change in densitometric ratio, compared with SS-K files (p < 0.05). Further tests of success (values: > or =0) and failure (value: < or =0) with the Fisher exact test showed more success (decreasing radiographic density) with NiTi files and more failures (increasing radiographic density) with SS-K type files (p < or = 0.03). This study indicates that maintaining the original canal shape after instrumentation leads to a better prognosis of endodontic treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pettiette et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: