As part of a critical evaluation of the pattern recognition method SIMCA, three data sets containing pyrolysis mass spectra from bacteria were analysed using the SIMCA classifier. Each set consisted of two classes, Pseudomonas and Serratia bacteria, each class containing ten mass spectra and each mass spectrum having 285 spectral features. The results indicate that for these py‐MS data sets, with low object/feature ratio, the SIMCA classifier produces satisfactory results at the first classification level. At the second level, however, the classification results are not reliable, even after deleting outliers. A comparison of the cross‐validation method and Malinowski's indicator function for the determination of the number of significant principal components showed that the cross‐validation method is less stable and therefore less reliable than the indicator function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dröge et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: