Key result
Anatomical factors did not influence interarm blood pressure differences, and an absolute brachial systolic difference of 4.2 mmHg translated to a 3.1 mmHg difference in derived central pressure.
Why the study?
It is unclear whether anatomical factors contribute to brachial interarm blood pressure differences or whether these differences translate to differences in derived central aortic blood pressure.
Do interarm differences in brachial blood pressure correlate with anatomical factors and translate to differences in derived central aortic blood pressure in community-dwelling adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=77)
No
Do interarm differences in brachial blood pressure correlate with anatomical factors and translate to differences in derived central aortic blood pressure in community-dwelling adults?
Interarm differences in brachial systolic blood pressure do not correlate with anatomical factors but translate to small differences in derived central blood pressure, which are likely artefactual.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interarm brachial BP differences likely reflect measurement artifact; hypothesis-generating for clinical relevance and requires prospective validation.
Background Inter-arm differences in brachial systolic Blood Pressure (BP) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. It is unclear whether anatomical factors contribute to brachial Interarm Blood Pressure (IABP) differences or whether brachial IABP differences translate to differences in derived central aortic BP. This study aimed to ascertain whether IABP differences in brachial BP correlate with anatomical factors (arm side, dominance, and geometry) and translate to differences in derived central BP. Methods Brachial BP and derived central BP were measured simultaneously in both arms in 77 community-dwelling adults (18–66 years, 38 male) using two SphygmoCor XCEL (AtCor Medical) BP devices. Measurements were taken 3–4 times in each participant, swapping devices between measurements. An optoelectronic volumeter (Perometer 350S) and hand-held dynamometer (Saehan) were used to measure arm volume and maximal hand-grip strength. Differences in brachial and derived central BP between arms were evaluated by paired t-tests. Regression analysis was used to examine predictors of IABP differences. Results Absolute IABP difference in brachial systolic BP was 4.2 ± 3.6 mmHg. Brachial systolic IABP differences were not different between arms (right/left, dominant/non-dominant, or large/small arm volume). Brachial systolic IABP differences were not correlated with differences in arm volume or grip strength. Male sex and diastolic BP were the only predictors. Brachial systolic IABP difference translated to a small (3.1 ± 2.4 mmHg) difference in derived central BP. Conclusion As there is only a single aortic BP, we consider the difference in derived central BP likely an artefact. The possibility that it results from BP variability warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peebles et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy community-dwelling adults (n=77). Anatomical factors (arm side, dominance, and geometry) vs. Opposite arm (left, non-dominant, or smaller arm) was evaluated on Absolute interarm difference in brachial systolic blood pressure (4.2 ± 3.6 mmHg, p=<0.001). Anatomical factors did not influence interarm blood pressure differences, and an absolute brachial systolic difference of 4.2 mmHg translated to a 3.1 mmHg difference in derived central pressure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: