Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The procedure used with the Du Pont aca for alpha-amylase (1,4,-alpha-D-glucan glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1) was evaluated in our laboratory and compared with the Roche Diagnostics "Amylochrome" and Perkin-Elmer Coleman 91 amylase assays. The within-run coefficients of variation (CV) for samples of fresh normal sera were: aca 5.8% and 4.3% on two different lots of reagent, Amylochrome 7.4%, and Coleman 91 3.3%. In sera with abnormally high amylase activity, the respective CV's were: aca, 1.2% and 0.8%; Amylochrome, 2.0%; and Coleman 91, 2.8%. Day-to-day precision studies on fresh and lyophilized normal and abnormal sera gave CV's in the following ranges: aca, 1.8% to 6.7%; Amylochrome, 3.0% to 5.2%; and Coleman 91, 4.5% to 5.9%. Results by the aca procedure were linearly related to activity to about 10-fold the upper limit of normal amylase activity. For serum, correlations were: r = 0.977 for aca vs. Coleman 91 and r = 0.974 for aca vs. Amylochrome. For urine they were: r = 0.978 for aca vs. Coleman 91 and r = 0.975 for aca vs. Amylochrome. Mean recovery from 53 supplemented samples was 98%. Icterus, hemolysis, and lipemia did not interfere with method correlation of aca vs. Coleman 91 or Amylochrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: