BACKGROUND: Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) is widely used in cancer diagnostics and requires positive controls to confirm DNA integrity and bisulfite conversion. Positive control assays include conversion-specific PCR (CSP) and cytosine-free fragment (CFF) assays. Despite their ubiquity and critical need in MSP assays, positive control assays lack systematic technical performance evaluation. METHODS: Twelve positive control assays (9 CSP, 3 CFF), including 10 established and 2 novel designs, were evaluated under PCR conditions optimized for modern multiplexed MSP. Assays were tested via DNA-intercalating dye detection across bisulfite-converted and unconverted human DNA templates for amplification consistency across replicates, conversion specificity, primer dimer formation, and PCR efficiency. The 2 novel assays were multiplexed and assessed on cell-free DNA and tissue samples via droplet digital PCR. RESULTS: Performance varied markedly across assays. Four CSP assays (ACTB-C, ACTB-D, ACTB-P3, and ZGPAT) demonstrated low replicate variability (SD 0.1-0.6 Cq), near-ideal PCR efficiencies (98%-102%) with strong linearity (R2 ≥ 0.996), minimal amplification of unconverted blood DNA (≤25%), and limited primer dimer formation. Among CFF assays, cfUQ11-CFF showed the best performance, with efficiencies of 92%-97%, strong linearity (R2 ≥ 0.995), and low rates of primer dimer formation (25% of no-template control wells). In multiplex digital PCR on cfDNA, the 2 novel assays demonstrated strong concordance with Qubit-derived DNA estimates (R2 = 0.928 and 0.912). CONCLUSIONS: Positive control assay selection critically impacts MSP reliability and quantitation. From 12 assays tested, we highlight 4 CSP assays and one CFF assay that meet performance requirements and are suitable for further application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catalan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: