Key result
Digital health coaching improved self-reported global cognition from 16.18 to 15.52 (p=0.03), while health education improved neuropsychological cognitive ability from 104.48 to 108.76 (p<0.001) in adults at-risk for Alzheimer's disease.
Why the study?
Modifiable lifestyle factors are linked to Alzheimer's disease and related dementias risk, but the effectiveness of health coaching targeting these factors compared with standard health education was unclear.
Does personalized health coaching improve cognition and reduce Alzheimer's risk in at-risk adults compared to health education?
RCT (n=216)
Open-label
Binary random number generator with an equal allocation randomization rule
No
Does personalized health coaching improve cognition and reduce Alzheimer's risk in at-risk adults compared to health education?
p-value: p=0.03
Health coaching and health education can both improve cognition in adults at risk for Alzheimer's, with coaching potentially offering increased protection against ADRD risk.
Both interventions may support cognition in at-risk adults; leaves open optimal strategy for ADRD prevention.
Several modifiable lifestyle factors have been linked to cognitive ability and the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Health coaching (HC) is an intervention that addresses lifestyle factors associated with cognition. The effectiveness of an HC protocol was evaluated and compared with a health education (HE) intervention, representing the current standard of care, in a sample of 216 adults between the ages of 45 and 75 years who were at-risk for developing ADRD. Outcomes examined were global cognition, neuropsychological cognition, and Alzheimer's risk. HC participants received personalized coaching from a health coach focusing on nutrition, physical activity, sleep, stress, social engagement, and cognitive activity. HE participants received biweekly education materials focusing on the same modifiable lifestyle factors addressed by HC. Participants were assessed at baseline and again 4 months later. Self-reported global cognition scores improved only in the HC group (16.18 to 15.52, p = .03) and neuropsychological cognitive ability improved in the HE group (104.48 to 108.76, p < .001). When non-adherence in the HC group was accounted for, however, the mean change in neuropsychological score was similar between groups (p > .05), self-reported global cognition demonstrated an even larger mean improvement in the HC group (16.20 to 15.41, p = .01), and the HC group saw an improvement in ADRD protective risk score (- 10.39 to - 11.45, p = .007). These results indicate that HC and HE can both improve cognition, but HC may be more effective and may yield increased protection against ADRD risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campitelli et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in At-risk for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) (n=216). Digital health coaching vs. Health education was evaluated on Self-reported global cognition (ECog-12) (p=0.03). Digital health coaching improved self-reported global cognition from 16.18 to 15.52 (p=0.03), while health education improved neuropsychological cognitive ability from 104.48 to 108.76 (p<0.001) in adults at-risk for Alzheimer's disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: