Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The structure of the hypothetical copper-metallochaperone CopZ from Bacillus subtilis and its predicted partner CopA have been studied but their respective contributions to copper export, -import, -sequestration and -supply are unknown. DeltacopA was hypersensitive to copper and contained more copper atoms cell(-1) than wild-type. Expression from the copA operator-promoter increased in elevated copper (not other metals), consistent with a role in copper export. A bacterial two-hybrid assay revealed in vivo interaction between CopZ and the N-terminal domain of CopA but not that of a related transporter, YvgW, involved in cadmium-resistance. Activity of copper-requiring cytochrome caa(3) oxidase was retained in deltacopZ and deltacopA. DeltacopZ was only slightly copper-hypersensitive but deltacopZ/deltacopA was more sensitive than deltacopA, implying some action of CopZ that is independent of CopA. Significantly, deltacopZ contained fewer copper atoms cell(-1) than wild-type under these conditions. CopZ makes a net contribution to copper sequestration and/or recycling exceeding any donation to CopA for export.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radford et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: