Introduction: For endodontic therapy to be successful, the root canal system must be well sealed. This study evaluated the push-out bond strength of two bio ceramic sealers: CeraSeal and MTA-Fillapex using three obturation techniques: cold lateral compaction (CLC), warm vertical compaction (WVC), and thermoplasticized gutta-percha (TPGP). Materials and Methods: A total of 48 single-rooted human teeth were selected, prepared, and categorized into six experimental groups ( n = 8 each) based on sealer and obturation technique. Following preparation, the canals were sealed using with either CeraSeal or MTA-Fillapex using CLC, WVC, or TPGP. After 1 week, 3 mm-thick root slices (middle third) underwent assessment of push-out bond strength. Comparisons were carried out using two-way analysis of variance, and intergroup differences were further explored using Tukey’s post hoc test with the significance level set at 5%. Results: The CeraSeal groups demonstrated significantly higher push-out bond strengths compared to the corresponding MTA-Fillapex groups across all obturation techniques ( P < 0.05). Among all, the greatest mean bond strength values were noted in the CeraSeal group obturated with the CLC technique, which recorded a value of 5.99 ± 0.50 MPa. In contrast, the lowest bond strength was noted in the MTA-Fillapex group using the TPGP technique, with a mean value of 0.85 ± 0.20 MPa. When comparing obturation techniques within each sealer group, the trend consistently followed the order: CLC > WVC > TPGP, with statistically meaningful differences between techniques ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: The bioceramic sealer outperformed the MTA-based sealer in push-out bond strength across all obturation techniques. Notably, the CLC technique yielded superior sealer–dentin adhesion compared to warm obturation methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mondal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: