On the relevance of the 8‐chain model and the full‐network model for the deformation and failure of networks formed through photopolymerization of multifunctional monomers

Crosslinked networks were synthesized by copolymerization of mono‐functional tert‐butyl acrylate (tBA) with diethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (DEGDMA) or polyethylene glycol dimethacrylates (PEGDMA). By varying the chain length and concentration of the difunctional PEGDMA, we obtained tBA‐PEGDMA copolymer networks while by varying the concentration of difunctional DEGDMA, we obtained tBA‐DEGDMA crosslinked networks. The various materials were submitted to large deformations through uniaxial tension tests. For moderate weight percent of crosslinking agent, up to 20%, the networks showed standard S‐shape stress–strain curves, characteristic of rubber‐like elasticity. Two macromolecular models, the 8‐chain model and the full‐network model, were applied to fit the uniaxial tensile response of the materials. Both models provide good representations of the overall uniaxial stress–strain response of each material. After fitting to stress–strain data, the network models were employed to predict the shear modulus and the elongation at break. Neither the 8‐chain nor the full network model were capable of predicting the failure strain or shear modulus, indicating these models are best used to describe stress–strain relations rather than predict mechanical properties for the network polymers considered here.