Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the present study DNA was used as a scaffold for the supramolecular assembly of organic chromophores for photochemical upconversion (PUC). Initially, a green-to-blue PUC was observed using free chromophores in solution: tris(2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium(II), [Ru(bpy)3](2+), which acts as a long-wavelength absorber (λex = 500 nm), and an in situ energy donor to an acceptor (R)-1-O-[4-(1-pyrenylethynyl)phenylmethyl]glycerol (PEPy or TINA monomer), which acts as an annihilator and short-wavelength photoemitter (λem = 420 nm). Then, DNA duplexes possessing TINA monomers were synthesized, and complexes with [Ru(bpy)3](2+) were investigated. In contrast to the dynamic interactions of [Ru(bpy)3](2+) with TINA monomer free in solution, ground-state complex formation was the predominant mechanism of interaction between [Ru(bpy)3](2+) and DNA duplexes bearing two TINA monomers at the 5' ends as shown by fluorescence, circular dichroism (CD), and UV-vis spectroscopy studies. The use of TINA-modified DNAs led to PUC occurring at concentrations significantly lower than that for free chromophores in solution: 2.5 μM [Ru(bpy)3](2+) and 5.0 μM TINA-modified duplex in the DNA-based systems in aqueous buffer versus 46 μM [Ru(bpy)3](2+) and 4.6 mM TINA monomer for the free donor and acceptor in DCM, respectively. Providing vast capabilities of DNA in the development of novel photonic systems as a result of the controllable organization of various chromophores, this study opens a new perspective for the development of DNA-based light-harvesting systems using PUC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mutsamwira et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: